Determination of Asenapine Maleate in Pharmaceutical and Biological Matrices: A Critical Review of Analytical Techniques over the Past Decade.

Asenapine maleate is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic agent used in the treatment of schizophrenia, a neuropsychiatric disorder. It is available as a fast-dissolving sublingual tablet to avoid extensive first-pass metabolism with higher bioavailability as compared to oral formulations. Although, the established therapeutic solutions do not sufficiently satisfy the patient's safety and efficacy needs. Thus, the core research emphasis is to investigate strategies to produce novel formulations with enhanced safety and efficacy. This necessitates the development of robust, precise, and accurate methods for quantification of asenapine maleate in different sample matrices. Given the foregoing information, the current analysis concentrates on the different analytical techniques used to assess asenapine maleate in bulk, pharmaceutical formulations, and biological specimens. Reverse-phase HPLC coupled with UV detection is a majorly (nearly 50% of papers investigated) used technique for the estimation of asenapine maleate in formulations. On the other hand, for its quantification in the biological matrix, hyphenated techniques using mass spectrometry are widely used. This critical review reveals different analytical methodologies, including spectrophotometric, chromatographic, capillary electrophoresis techniques reported from 2011 to 2020, for the measurement of asenapine maleate in various sample matrices. The information presented in this review would be useful in future research for robust analytical method development for asenapine maleate utilizing a more scientific and risk-based approach. Also, it would aid to minimize analytical failure as well as method fine-tuning throughout the product life cycle. Further, this review may also direct scientists toward the development of methodologies for green research.

Treatment of Catatonia with Asenapine in a Patient with Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Psychotic Depression and Septic Shock from SARSCoV- 2 - A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome that presents with severe symptoms which can lead to dangerous and lethal conditions if not diagnosed and treated properly. SARS-- CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus that can occur in severe cases with acute pneumonia, ARDS, sepsis and septic shock. In these cases, ICU admission is necessary. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old Caucasian man with septic shock and bilateral interstitial pneumonia from SARS-CoV-2 and schizotypal personality disorder presented with catatonic behaviour manifested by soporous state, response to intense painful stimuli with the opening of the eyes, execution of simple verbal commands, maintenance of the same position, catalepsy, immobility, rigidity and mutism. At the same time, there were symptoms of septic shock and catatonic symptoms, causing greater difficulty in the correct formulation of the diagnosis. During the course of his hospitalization, he was treated with asenapine 20 mg/day. The catatonia responded rapidly and significantly to the asenapine. DISCUSSION: To date, the pathophysiology of catatonia is unclear, and few guidelines are available for the treatment of catatonia. In the literature, studies have reported the efficacy of benzodiazepines such as lorazepam and diazepam, GABAA agonists such as zolpidem, NMDA receptor antagonists such as memantine, antidepressant SSRIs such as fluoxetine and paroxetine, and antipsychotics such as olanzapine, clozapine and aripiprazole. We demonstrate that the antipsychotic asenapine is also effective in treating catatonic symptoms in psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: Asenapine produced a rapid and significant reduction in catatonic symptoms in our patient with schizotypal personality disorder.

Efficacy and Safety of HP-3070, an Asenapine Transdermal System, in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Asenapine is a second-generation antipsychotic used to treat individuals with schizophrenia. This phase 3 study assessed efficacy and safety of HP-3070, an asenapine transdermal system (patch), in adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this inpatient study, a 3- to 14-day screening/single-blind run-in washout period was followed by a 6-week double-blind period wherein patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia (DSM-5 criteria) were randomized 1:1:1 and received HP-3070 7.6 mg/24 h (n = 204), HP-3070 3.8 mg/24 h (n = 204), or placebo (n = 206). Primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score versus placebo; key secondary endpoint was CFB in week 6 Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness score versus placebo. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal assessments. RESULTS: Each of the HP-3070 doses demonstrated significant improvement versus placebo at week 6 for the primary and key secondary endpoints. Differences in the least-squares mean (LSM) (95% CI; adjusted P) of CFB for PANSS total scores were -4.8 (-8.06 to -1.64; adjusted P = .003) and -6.6 (-9.81 to -3.40; adjusted P < .001) for 7.6 mg/24 h and 3.8 mg/24 h, respectively. HP-3070 was well tolerated, with a systemic safety profile consistent with sublingual asenapine. Incidence of application site TEAEs was higher for HP-3070 (14.2%, 7.6 mg/24 h; 15.2%, 3.8 mg/24 h) versus placebo (4.4%). Discontinuations due to application site reactions or skin disorders (urticaria, pruritus) were infrequent (≤ 0.5% per treatment group). CONCLUSIONS: HP-3070 7.6 mg/24 h and 3.8 mg/24 h doses were efficacious and well tolerated. As the first transdermal antipsychotic patch available in the US, HP-3070 offers a novel treatment option for people with schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02876900; EudraCT number: 2015-005134-21.

Combinatorial Treatment of Birinapant and Zosuquidar Enhances Effective Control of HBV Replication In Vivo.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global health threat and affects hundreds of millions worldwide. Small molecule compounds that mimic natural antagonists of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, known as Smac-mimetics (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases-mimetics), can promote the death of HBV-replicating liver cells and promote clearance of infection in preclinical models of HBV infection. The Smac-mimetic birinapant is a substrate of the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) efflux pump, and therefore inhibitors of MDR1 increase intracellular concentration of birinapant in MDR1 expressing cells. Liver cells are known to express MDR1 and other drug pump proteins. In this study, we investigated whether combining the clinical drugs, birinapant and the MDR1 inhibitor zosuquidar, increases the efficacy of birinapant in killing HBV expressing liver cells. We showed that this combination treatment is well tolerated and, compared to birinapant single agent, was more efficient at inducing death of HBV-positive liver cells and improving HBV-DNA and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) control kinetics in an immunocompetent mouse model of HBV infection. Thus, this study identifies a novel and safe combinatorial treatment strategy to potentiate substantial reduction of HBV replication using an IAP antagonist.

Early improvements of individual symptoms as a predictor of treatment response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia.

AIM: It is well accepted that early improvement with antipsychotics predicts subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has examined the contribution of individual symptoms rather than overall symptom severity as the predictors. Thus, we aimed to detect individual symptoms whose improvements could predict subsequent response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine and examine whether a prediction model with individual symptoms would be superior to a model using overall symptom severity. METHODS: This study analyzed a dataset including 532 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of asenapine. Response to asenapine was defined as a ≥30% decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline to week 6. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations among response and PANSS total/individual item score improvements at week 1 or week 2. RESULTS: Response was associated with early improvement in the following PANSS items: disturbance of volition, active social avoidance, poor impulse control at week 1; and active social avoidance, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight at week 2. Prediction accuracy was almost compatible between the model with individual symptoms and the model with PANSS total score both at weeks 1 and 2 (Nagelkerke R2 : .51, .42 and .55, .54, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early improvement in negative symptoms, poor attention and impulse control, and lack of insight, in particular predicted subsequent treatment response in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with asenapine as accurately as prediction based on overall symptom severity.

Asenapine in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression.

Objectives: Asenapine, a potent serotonin 7 (5-HT7) receptor antagonist, was examined for efficacy as an antidepressant in depressed bipolar subjects. It was predicted that subjects with the genetic variant of the short form of the serotonin transporter (5HTTR) would be more likely to respond. Experimental Design: A subset of patients participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of asenapine in bipolar I depression also underwent genetic testing for the 5HTTR. Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score was ≥ 26 prior to randomization to asenapine or placebo for 8 weeks. Gene testing was performed before breaking the blind. Principal Observations: Nine patients completing the study also underwent gene testing. At study end, the average MADRS improvement was -19.80 ± SD 8.59 for the 4 people randomized to asenapine and -3.80 ± 9.01 for the 5 people receiving placebo (P = 0.021, t = 2.88). Anxiety, as measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), also improved in asenapine-treated patients (-15.40 ± 6.15 vs. -2.80 ± 7.95, P = 0.023, t = 2.803). Six participants had the short form of the 5HTTR, and it is believed they influenced the significant outcome in this small sample. Conclusions: While this is a very small sample, asenapine appears to have a beneficial effect on both depression and anxiety in depressed bipolar I patients compared to treatment with placebo. Due to the large fraction of subjects with the short form, the hypothesis that the SF-5HTTR might increase asenapine response could not be adequately tested.

Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of the selective p38 MAPK inhibitor Skepinone-L and the dual p38/JNK 3 inhibitor LN 950 in experimental K/BxN serum transfer arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling plays an important role in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA).The aim of our study was to elucidate the therapeutic potential of the highly selective p38 MAPK inhibitor Skepinone-L and the dual inhibitor LN 950 (p38 MAPK and JNK 3) in the K/BxN serum transfer model of RA. Additionally, we aimed to monitor MAPK treatment non-invasively in vivo using the hypoxia tracer [18F]fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO) and positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: To induce experimental arthritis, we injected glucose-6-phosphate isomerase autoantibody-containing serum in BALB/c mice. MAPK inhibitor or Sham treatment was administered per os once daily. On days 3 and 6 after arthritis induction, we conducted PET imaging with [18F]FMISO. At the end of the experiment, ankles were harvested for histopathological analysis. RESULTS: Skepinone-L and LN 950 were applicable to suppress the severity of experimental arthritis confirmed by reduced ankle swelling and histopathological analysis. Skepinone-L (3.18 ± 0.19 mm) and LN 950 (3.40 ± 0.13 mm) treatment yielded a significantly reduced ankle thickness compared to Sham-treated mice (3.62 ± 0.11 mm) on day 5 after autoantibody transfer, a time-point characterized by severe arthritis. Hypoxia imaging with [18F]FMISO revealed non-conclusive results and might not be an appropriate tool to monitor MAPK therapy in experimental RA. CONCLUSION: Both the selective p38 MAPK inhibitor Skepinone-L and the dual (p38 MAPK and JNK 3) inhibitor LN 950 exhibited significant therapeutic effects during experimental arthritis. Thus, our study contributes to the ongoing discussion on the use of p38 MAPK as a potential target in RA.

Evidence of a role for functional heterogeneity in multidrug resistance transporters in clinical trials of P-glycoprotein modulation in acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance (MDR) transporter proteins such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux a variety of chemotherapeutic drugs from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts leading to clinical drug resistance. METHODS: This study examined heterogeneity of MDR functional efflux by AML blasts using two flow cytometry bioassays. Bone marrow specimens (N = 50) from elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML were analyzed for CD34+ blasts with MDR efflux function. Efflux was measured with a fluorescent dye (DiOC2 ) as a surrogate for oncology drugs that are substrates for MDR efflux. P-gp-mediated efflux was differentiated from non-P-gp MDR activities using zosuquidar, a highly selective P-gp modulator. The bioassays included a zosuquidar-dependent DiOC2 accumulation bioassay that measured only P-gp. The second method, termed the efflux bioassay, could detect P-gp and other non-P-gp efflux depending on bioassay culture conditions. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of the specimens were considered positive for blasts with P-gp function, and 26% of such P-gp-positive specimens also exhibited zosuquidar-resistant (i.e., non-P-gp) MDR efflux activity; 37% of P-gp-negative AML blast specimens displayed zosuquidar-resistant MDR function in the efflux bioassay. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the heterogeneous nature of MDR efflux pumps in AML blasts, and provide support for the hypothesis that non-P-gp MDR contributed to negative results with zosuquidar in AML trials like ECOG-ACRIN E3999. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Zosuquidar, a novel modulator of P-glycoprotein, does not improve the outcome of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3999.

Zosuquidar, which modulates P-glycoprotein (P-gp) with minimal delay of anthracycline clearance, may reverse P-gp-mediated resistance in acute myeloid leukemia without increased toxicity. A total of 449 adults older than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3999). Overall survival was compared between patients receiving conventional-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin and either zosuquidar (550 mg; 212 patients) or placebo (221 patients). Median and 2-year overall survival values were 7.2 months and 20% on zosuquidar and 9.4 months and 23% on placebo, respectively (P = .281). Remission rate was 51.9% on zosuquidar and 48.9% on placebo. All cause mortality to day 42 was not different (zosuquidar 22.2% vs placebo 16.3%; P = .158). In vitro modulation of P-gp activity by zosuquidar and expression of P-gp, multidrug resistance-related protein 1, lung resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein, were comparable in the 2 arms. Poor-risk cytogenetics were more common in P-gp(+) patients. P-gp expression and cytogenetics were correlated, though independent prognostic factors. We conclude that zosuquidar did not improve outcome in older acute myeloid leukemia, in part, because of the presence P-gp independent mechanisms of resistance. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00046930.

Amineptine treatment of persistent catatonic symptoms in schizophrenia: a controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the treatment response of enduring catatonic phenomena accompanying chronic schizophrenia are few and far between. The aim of this study was to explore the therapeutic effects of add-on amineptine, a dopamine agonist antidepressant in chronic catatonia occurring in schizophrenia. METHOD: Fifteen subjects with DSM-IV schizophrenia presenting with persistent catatonic features underwent a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial; they were treated for 6 weeks each with amineptine and a placebo, with a 3-week wash-out period in between. The primary outcome measures were the sum scores of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and the Modified Rogers Scale. Changes in other aspects of psychopathology and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) constituted the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Amineptine augmentation of antipsychotic treatment had no appreciable effect on either of the catatonia ratings. Apart from a statistically significant but clinically negligible improvement in the negative symptom scores, there were no changes in the psychopathology and EPS ratings. CONCLUSION: The lack of a therapeutic effect of the dopamine agonist amineptine on persistent catatonic signs and symptoms suggests that the dopamine system may not have a decisive role in the pathophysiology of chronic catatonic syndrome arising in the context of schizophrenia.

Treatment for amphetamine withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Few studies examined treatments for amphetamine withdrawal, although it is a common problem among amphetamine users. Its symptoms, in particular intense craving, may be a critical factor leading to relapse to amphetamine use. In clinical practice, medications for cocaine withdrawal are commonly used to manage amphetamine withdrawal although the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of these two illicit substances are different. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological alone or in combination with psychosocial treatment for amphetamine withdrawals on discontinuation rates, global state, withdrawal symptoms, craving, and other outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (1966 - 2008), CINAHL (1982 - 2008), PsycINFO (1806 - 2008), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library 2008 issue 2), references of obtained articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled and clinical trials evaluating pharmacological and or psychosocial treatments (alone or combined) for people with amphetamine withdrawal symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors evaluated and extracted data independently. The data were extracted from intention-to-treat analyses. The Relative Risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to assess dichotomous outcomes. The Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with 95% CI was used to assess continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Four randomised controlled trials (involving 125 participants) met the inclusion criteria for the review. Two studies found that amineptine significantly reduced discontinuation rates and improved overall clinical presentation, but did not reduce withdrawal symptoms or craving compared to placebo. The benefits of mirtazapine over placebo for reducing amphetamine withdrawal symptoms were not as clear. One study suggested that mirtazapine may reduce hyperarousal and anxiety symptoms associated with amphetamine withdrawal. A more recent study failed to find any benefit of mirtazapine over placebo on retention or on amphetamine withdrawal symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No medication is effective for treatment of amphetamine withdrawal. Amineptine showed reduction in discontinuation rates and improvement in clinical presentation compared to placebo, but had no effect on reducing withdrawal symptoms or craving. In spite of these limited benefits, amineptine is not available for use due to concerns over abuse liability when using the drug. The benefits of mirtazapine as a withdrawal agent are less clear based on findings from two randomised controlled trials: one report showed improvements in amphetamine withdrawal symptoms over placebo; a second report showed no differences in withdrawal symptoms compared to placebo. Further potential treatment studies should examine medications that increase central nervous system activity involving dopamine, norepinephrine and/or serotonin neurotransmitters, including mirtazapine.

Leukemic blast and natural killer cell P-glycoprotein function and inhibition in a clinical trial of zosuquidar infusion in acute myeloid leukemia.

A bioassay was developed to assess P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function of peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells and AML blasts during zosuquidar infusion. Cells were incubated with the fluorescent dye DiOC(2)(3) in the presence and absence of zosuquidar, and dye accumulation measured by flow cytometry. The assay performance was assessed using NK cells and the P-gp-positive K562/R7 cell line, and then utilized to determine the function of P-gp and its inhibition by zosuquidar in AML blasts and NK cells from patients enrolled in a Phase I trial. The assay of zosuquidar-inhibitable accumulation of DiOC(2) is robust and reproducible.

Reversing the multidrug resistance in acute leukemia: until the leukemia initiating cell?

Reversal of drug resistance is of pivotal importance in order to improve the results of chemotherapy. Monitoring of such reversal is necessary in order to analyze the results of clinical trials. Nonetheless, the leukemia cell population to eradicate is the leukemia initiating cells characterized by a CD34+CD38- phenotype. The evaluation of novel drug resistance modulators should be performed both in the whole leukemic cell population and in the leukemia initiating cell compartment, that is responsible for "mature" leukemia cells replenishment.

Zosuquidar restores drug sensitivity in P-glycoprotein expressing acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapeutic drug efflux via the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter encoded by the MDR1/ABCB1 gene is a significant cause of drug resistance in numerous malignancies, including acute leukemias, especially in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therefore, the P-gp modulators that block P-gp-mediated drug efflux have been developed, and used in combination with standard chemotherapy. In this paper, the capacity of zosuquidar, a specific P-gp modulator, to reverse chemoresistance was examined in both leukemia cell lines and primary AML blasts. METHODS: The transporter protein expressions were analyzed by flow cytometry using their specific antibodies. The protein functionalities were assessed by the uptake of their fluorescence substrates in presence or absence their specific modulators. The drug cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT test. RESULTS: Zosuquidar completely or partially restored drug sensitivity in all P-gp-expressing leukemia cell lines tested and enhanced the cytotoxicity of anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone) and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) in primary AML blasts with active P-gp. In addition, P-gp inhibition by zosuquidar was found to be more potent than cyclosporine A in cells with highly active P-gp. CONCLUSION: These in vitro studies suggest that zosuquidar may be an effective adjunct to cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML patients whose blasts express P-gp, especially for older patients.

Phase I/II trial of a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, Zosuquidar.3HCl trihydrochloride (LY335979), given orally in combination with the CHOP regimen in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A phase I/II trial was performed to investigate the safety and tolerance of zosuquidar.3HCL, a potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), when administered orally alone and in combination with the CHOP regimen in patients with untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and to determine whether zosuquidar.3HCL affects pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and vincristine. Doses of CHOP remained constant and the doses of zosuquidar.3HCL were increased from 200 to 500 mg per dose. A total of 15 patients were treated at three dose levels. A target dose providing peak and trough levels compatible with prolonged modulation of P-gp function was obtained in patients receiving three doses of 500 mg of zosuquidar.3HCL p.o. At this dose level, toxicity was minimal and no enhancement of CHOP-related toxicity was observed. Zosuquidar.3HCL did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and had moderate effects on the pharmacokinetics of vincristine. Zosuquidar.3HCL can be safely administered with CHOP therapy using a 24-h schedule.

Benefits and risks of pharmacotherapy for dysthymia: a systematic appraisal of the evidence.

BACKGROUND: Dysthymia is a prevalent form of subthreshold depressive disorder, associated with considerable disability and high co-morbidity. This paper systematically appraises the evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of the pharmacological treatment for this condition. METHODS: Randomised, controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of drug therapies for dysthymia were included. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed, aiming to avoid publication bias. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated with the Random Effect Model method. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) were estimated for statistically significant results. RESULTS: Twenty-five trials were included for the main comparisons. Regarding placebo-controlled trials (n = 16), similar results were obtained in terms of efficacy for different groups of drugs, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and other drugs (sulpiride, amineptine, and ritanserin). The pooled RR for treatment response was 0.68 (95% CI 0.57-0.81) for TCA and the NNT was 4.3 (95% CI 3.2-6.5); 0.68 (95% CI 0.56-0.82) for SSRIs (NNT 5.1; 95% CI 3.9-7.7); 0.59 (95% CI 0.48-0.71) for MAOIs (NNT 2.9; 95% CI 2.2-4.3). Other drugs (amisulpride, amineptine and ritanserin) showed similar results. The equivalent efficacy between antidepressants as found in trials where active medications were compared confirmed the efficacy findings from placebo trials. In general, patients treated with a TCA were more likely to report adverse events, compared with placebo and SSRIs. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacotherapy for dysthymia appears to be an effective short-term treatment for dysthymic disorder. Newer antidepressants are equally effective and have better acceptability than TCAs, although their higher cost must be balanced against this assumed advantage.